Over the last 12 months we’ve reported numerous stories of user who have fallen foul of iLok licence transfers, particularly ones described by PACE as duplicate licences.

This means if you have purchased a used iLok asset from a third party, via various sources such as Ebay, if any issue should occur then PACE take the licence back off the buyer, this leaves the buyer with no licence and out of pocket, it also puts the onus on the buyer to get the matter fixed.

Simple question, who do you think should take a hit on a duplicate iLok transfer issue?

Some of you are sellers and others reading this buyers, some are both, so we would be interested in both points of view.

As ever vote and have your say in the comments.

<a href="http://polldaddy.com/poll/8245208/">Who Should Take The Hit On A Duplicate iLok Transfer?</a>